Years after so many of the members who worked on Peter Pan in the 1950s passed away mostly from old age, the dumbasses who were masturbating to money decided to make another sequel, this time involving Peter Pan. Though not as ill received as a large chunk of the cheapquels, it still generated negative reception.

The octopus itself isn’t even that threatening looking. The ones from Banjo-Tooie’s Jolly Roger Lagoon were much more menacing.

Hate to bring September 11th up, but since Return to Neverland came out nearly six months after the world witnessed that attack, why, and I mean why would you have a family movie involving an air raid and bombs?! Rick and Morty had a scene where they attack like in Pearl Harbor in 1941 but that’s an adult cartoon and that episode aired nearly 80 years after Pearl Harbor, yet they were willing to back off on doing something that resembled September 11th. Maybe I’m overreacting to this, but I would’ve had trouble going to school after seeing this.

I don’t understand why the late Roy E. Disney didn’t intervene with these movies; perhaps he didn’t have a say in any of it, but come on man he was a descendent of Walt and Roy Disney. Fantasia 2000 was under his supervision, so where was he when this was being made?

I can’t believe Captain Hook would actually THINK Jane looked similar to Wendy. The hairstyle doesn’t match and her outfit is a different color. Did they seriously make Captain Hook braindead?

The first part of the movie is pointless. I’m confused; is it supposed to be Peter Pan or some animated movie trying to be Indiana Jones?

1. The beginning feels less like Peter Pan and more like Medal of Honor or Indiana Jones.
2. Yeah I’m pretty sure Kathryn Beaumount was still able to voice Wendy in this one. Not sure WHY they didn’t go with that. She voiced Alice in Kingdom Hearts, so what’s the excuse?
3. They couldn’t bring the crocodile back and instead we got an octopus. Were the crew behind this playing Octopus on Game and Watch Gallery or listening to Octopus Garden from the Beatles?
4. Look, as a whole, I find this movie insulting to Walt Disney’s legacy, typical of my narrative toward some of these cheapquels that were affiliated with any of the 20ish animated movies he partook in development.
5. Poorly aged CGI? Why?! They could’ve animated the ship and all that other stuff without CGI!
6. Exactly why is Jane acting like she’s one of the militia at the beginning? Most she could be in the military at her age would be one of their drummers like Johnny Shiloh or something instead of blowing enemy heads off. Besides she was due to leaving London anyway so there’s that.
7. Most of the movie is identical to the first. For example, Hook scams Jane just like he did with Tinkerbell originally. Home Alone 2 did this as well but there was still enough to distinguish it from the original and isn’t a shit movie.