Right after the success of the Hunchback of Notre Dame, the manatees were brought in and connected Hunchback of Notre Dame to the cheapquel combine with their idea balls. Considered to be one of the lowest rated of the cheapquels, Hunchback of Notre Dame II has been given sub-zero reception for bad animation, annoying characters, and serving no purpose other than quick and dirty money for Disney.

Quasimodo falls for Madellaine, one Sarousch’s followers, who tries to steal a famous bell known as La Fidele for Sarousch, while Sarousch and his band of thieves conduct raids all over Paris disguised as a circus.

Phoebus’s army in the sewers have no distance attacking capabilities. Not even one guy who throws knives/spears/darts/etc. or even a cannon. I didn’t mention archers since Phoebus probably never wanted to see one in an army again after the first movie.

Like Belle’s Magical World, considered to be one of the supreme worst of the cheapquels.

Apparently this was in production for quite a while; the movie had a copyright of 2000 according to the Disney wiki.

1. It’s something to watch while trying to outdrink yourself which is the only way to really enjoy this.

Cons

1. Characters got a dosage of brain damage. One of the people who were raided by Sarousch and his band of thieves said they took his life savings; is that supposed to be a joke?
2. Phoebus’s competence has dropped to the level of Chief Wiggum. And no that arrow wound from the first movie didn’t cause this. He’s literally being stupid because the writers probably masturbated to stupid characters.
3. Horrible animation for 2002. Even if this was in production in the late 90s that’s not an excuse; it looks like it was made in the early 1980s.
4. Zephyr is annoying and is on a similar level of annoyance as Willie from Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. I wish Sarousch would’ve just blown his head off with a gun.
5. Song numbers are just as fun as getting AIDS.